GLOW/KLOW are Worthless?

Happy Friday!

I just dropped a brand new episode on Spotify that I’ve been meaning to record for weeks, and I finally sat down and knocked it out because the questions have been nonstop.

Are the GLOW and KLOW blends actually efficacious, or are they “dead on arrival” the moment you mix them?

GLOW being GHK-Cu + BPC-157 + TB-500.

KLOW being that same blend plus KPV.

If you’ve been in my world long enough, you know I’m not the guy who screams in black-and-white absolutes just to get engagement.

I don’t operate from fear, and I don’t operate from shock value.

I focus on education, pattern recognition, and receipts.

So in the episode, I do what I always do.

I take the strongest arguments AGAINST these blends seriously and ask one question.

Does it hold up when you actually check the chemistry, the biology, and the data?

Short answer.

Yes, these blends are stable, and yes, they work. And I’m going to show you why.

Confusion

First, let’s talk about why this got so confusing so fast.

I don’t even know what’s going on in the social media landscape anymore because I’ve been deleted from almost everything, including Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube.

I can’t even view a lot of the links people send me because you have to be logged in, and I literally can’t log in.

But people inside my group and on my email list keep forwarding the same talking points, and it’s always the same pattern.

Someone makes a confident, fear-based claim.

“Blends don’t work.”

“GHK strips everything.”

“Studies prove it.”

Then they rattle off 10 citations like it’s a courtroom closing argument.

So I did what any rational person should do. I looked up the studies.

And here’s what’s wild.

In 2026, we now have a new problem.

We’re now in a world where AI can generate academic-sounding citations that look real. That means everyone, including well-intentioned people, needs to slow down and verify sources more carefully.

So now let’s dismantle the actual arguments one by one.

Argument 1

The first argument is copper coordination disruption.

Translation.

“GHK-Cu is fragile because the copper can fall off when it’s mixed with other peptides. If copper falls off, GHK doesn’t work, and it ruins the whole blend.”

This sounds smart. It uses real words. It feels like chemistry.

However, copper falls off under specific conditions.

The big ones are:

That’s why I tell people, do not mix vitamin C or glutathione into the same vial as GHK-Cu.

Could it be convenient? Absolutely.

Two of the worst shots in one shot. But it’s not worth it. It will mess with copper chemistry.

Now, do BPC-157, TB-500, or KPV act like EDTA or glutathione?

No.

Argument 2

Next is the pH argument.

“GHK-Cu wants acidic pH, BPC and TB want neutral pH, so when you mix them, they destabilize and precipitate.”

Again, sounds scientific.

But here’s the high school chemistry version.

To destroy a peptide with pH, you usually need to push it way out of the normal range.

Either strongly acidic or strongly basic.

Bacteriostatic water is not extreme. It’s basically water with a preservative. It does not magically turn into battery acid because you dissolved a few milligrams of peptide.

BPC-157 is literally known as a “stable gastric pentadecapeptide.” It survives in stomach conditions. That’s pH 1 to 3.

So if a peptide is stable in stomach acid, the idea that a vial at physiologic pH will destroy it is not a serious argument.

Now, can precipitation happen in certain peptide solutions?

Yes.

But precipitation is a formulation and handling issue.

High concentration, poor mixing technique, temperature abuse, contamination, shaking the vial like a protein shake.

That’s what causes problems.

If you ever see cloudiness or particulates, don’t use it. That’s just basic common sense.

Argument 3

Now we get into two arguments that are real categories of risk, but massively exaggerated.

Aggregation and oxidation.

Aggregation means peptides clump together.

Oxidation means certain amino acids can get chemically modified by reactive oxygen species.

Both are real.

But these risks depend heavily on the peptide sequence and the environment.

Small, water-soluble peptides are far less likely to aggregate than big complex peptides.

That’s why I tell people, don’t mix something like a GLP-1 into a random “kitchen sink” peptide blend.

Bigger peptides are more fragile. You can cause aggregation.

But GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500 fragments, and KPV are not those molecules.

Oxidation is also real, but GHK-Cu is copper chelated.

It’s not a free copper salt floating around causing chaos.

And the people screaming “90% degradation in 2 hours” cite papers that can’t be found.

Lab Tests

This is where the conversation ends for me.

In my video, I show multiple analytical reports that show the peptides are actually present in the vial.

You can see the peaks on the chromatogram. You can see the content amounts. You can see the purity.

And then the most important piece.

A 21-day degradation test on the blend after reconstitution.

And what do we see?

Roughly 2 to 3 percent degradation over 21 days across the components.

Not zero. Not dead. Not worthless.

Normal peptide behavior.

If you ran a similar test on many single-peptide vials, you’d see similar drift over time. Peptides are not immortal. They degrade slowly. That’s why we store them correctly.

And this is the Occam’s razor moment.

If the blends were truly garbage and DOA, then the implication would be that every lab running these tests is committing fraud at scale.

Multiple labs. Multiple batches. Over and over.

Does that make sense?

No.

What makes sense is that social media incentivizes fear, conflict, and certainty. And AI makes it easy to generate fake citations that feel real.

Final Thoughts

I want to end on the bigger point, because this is about more than GLOW and KLOW.

It’s about what’s happening in the peptide industry as a whole.

We are a tiny slice of humanity. 0.01%. Maybe less.

And yet we have people in the same movement trying to tear each other apart for attention, money, and ego.

A house divided against itself cannot stand.

Fear-based marketing hurts the entire market.

It makes all of us look like snake oil salesmen.

It keeps the average person from ever touching something that could change their health.

And it distracts from what actually matters.

Quality manufacturing. Third-party testing. Education. Proper storage. Proper reconstitution. Proper expectations.

If you want to stay in touch with me, the email list is the best place.

And if you want a community where we can talk freely without censorship on social media, my private group is where I prioritize answering questions and helping people.

Best,

Hunter Williams

P.S. If you want to try the efficacy of the GLOW blend for yourself, you can get it for 30% off at BioLongevity Labs, and save an additional 15% off when you use code HUNTERW at checkout as part of their healing sale.