Happy Thursday!
Earlier this week inside the Axion Collective, there was a post where we went deep on the following question:
Is it better to use NAD⁺, 5-Amino-1MQ, or both of them together?
That question matters more than people realize.
Most people don’t fail with these compounds due to bad products or bad dosing.
They fail because they’re solving the wrong problem.
I see this constantly. Someone feels flat, burned out, and cognitively dull and jumps straight to 5-Amino-1MQ because they heard it’s fantastic.
Another person has clear metabolic dysfunction and stubborn fat, but keeps hammering NAD⁺ injections, wondering why results plateau.
In reality, they both act on different failure points in human metabolism.
Once you understand what problem each one solves, the confusion disappears.
And more importantly, you stop wasting months chasing effects that were never going to show up in the first place.
Let’s break this down properly.
NAD⁺
NAD⁺ is not a fat loss compound.
It’s not a stimulant.
And it’s not a “longevity hack” in the way social media uses that term.
NAD⁺ is a fundamental redox molecule.
It sits at the center of mitochondrial energy production, DNA repair, circadian rhythm regulation, and cellular stress resilience.
When NAD⁺ is low, everything downstream suffers:
Mitochondria become inefficient
Sirtuins don’t activate properly
DNA repair slows
Stress tolerance drops
Cognitive endurance collapses
When you inject NAD⁺ (especially IM), you’re doing substrate replacement. You’re restoring a depleted system.
This is why NAD⁺ shines in very specific scenarios:
Chronic stress and burnout
Overtraining
Poor sleep
Alcohol exposure
Post-viral fatigue
Aging-related energy decline
Clinically, these people complain about feeling flat. Wired but tired. Mentally dull. Unable to recover.
In these cases, NAD⁺ alone often works beautifully.
However, NAD⁺ does not fix metabolic inefficiency.
It restores capacity.
And that distinction matters.
5-Amino-1MQ
5-Amino-1MQ works upstream of where most people think metabolism lives.
It doesn’t directly increase energy.
It doesn’t stimulate mitochondria directly.
And It doesn’t “boost NAD⁺ levels” in the way you think.
Instead, it inhibits NNMT (nicotinamide N-methyltransferase), an enzyme that quietly drains the NAD⁺ system over time.
NNMT does three problematic things:
Diverts nicotinamide away from NAD⁺ salvage
Creates methylation burden
Pushes metabolism toward fat storage and inefficiency
This is why elevated NNMT activity is associated with:
Obesity
Insulin resistance
Metabolic syndrome
Poor fat loss response
Rapid rebound after dieting
5-Amino-1MQ doesn’t always feel dramatic. In fact, some people don’t “feel” it at all.
But over weeks, body composition changes. Insulin sensitivity improves. Appetite normalizes. Fat loss becomes less resistant.
This makes it ideal in isolation for:
Metabolic dysfunction
Central adiposity
Diet-resistant fat
Long-term recomposition phases
But remember, if NAD⁺ is already depleted, blocking waste doesn’t help much.
You’re protecting a system that’s already empty.
Using Them Together
Think of NAD⁺ and 5-Amino-1MQ as solving opposite sides of the same equation.
NAD⁺ increases capacity.
5-Amino-1MQ increases efficiency.
If you only increase capacity, results spike, then flatten.
If you only increase efficiency, results are slow and muted if the system is underpowered.
Together, you improve NAD⁺ flux, not just your total levels.
That means:
Better mitochondrial output per unit NAD⁺
Less waste through NNMT
Less sympathetic overstimulation from high NAD⁺ dosing
More durable metabolic changes
This combination shines in:
Longevity protocols
GLP-1 plateaus
TRT users with metabolic slowdown
Aggressive fat-loss phases
High performers under chronic stress
Importantly, stacking them often allows lower doses of NAD⁺ to work better, because the system isn’t leaking anymore.
Pros vs. Cons
Category | NAD⁺ (IM) Alone | 5-Amino-1MQ (SubQ) Alone | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|
Increases NAD⁺ levels | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Reduces NAD⁺ waste | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Improves mitochondrial output | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
Improves insulin sensitivity | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ |
Fat loss signaling | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Energy & cognitive effects | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
Risk of overstimulation | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ (lower) |
Best for burnout | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Best for metabolic dysfunction | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Longevity durability | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
(⚠️ = yes, but indirectly, ❌ = no, ✅ = yes)
This table alone explains why so many people “half-succeed” when they only use one.
Final Thoughts
Here’s the simplest way to think about it.
If someone is:
Burned out
Flat
Overstressed
Under-recovered
NAD⁺ first. Refill the tank.
If someone is:
Metabolically inefficient
Carrying stubborn fat
Insulin resistant
Rebounding from diets
5-Amino-1MQ first. Fix the drain.
If someone wants:
Longevity
Durable metabolic change
Sustainable fat loss
Better stress tolerance over time
Use both.
NAD⁺ charges the battery.
5-Amino-1MQ stops the battery from leaking.
Once you understand that, dosing debates disappear, protocol confusion vanishes, and results finally become predictable.
Best,
Hunter Williams
P.S. You can get NAD⁺ at BioLongevity Labs for 40% off plus an additional 15% off when you use code HUNTERW at checkout.